original air max What is the point to namespaces in branches in git

What is the point to namespaces in branches in git

Ladies air max 90 original air max so I mainly use Mercurial for my projects and I ladies air max 90 decided to sit down and learn all Git’s shenanigans to discover if I’m in the right side (at least for me).

I’m learning that git uses namespaces for branches and I would like to know (in your experience) what is the point of namespaces, In Mercurial I could just set the convention of naming branches like so:

I imagine that there is more to it than just the name (aside from avoiding naming conflicts), but what do I get out of this seemingly more complicated (not necessarily bad) model?

Git doesn’t “use” namespaces in the sense like they are required. It offers the completely optional ability for a user to use namespaces if they want them. You can use the exact same naming convention as you did in mercurial if you want, and I imagine that’s what the vast majority of people do.

What namespaces buy you is the ability to combine multiple repositories into one, but be able to original air ladies air max 90 max only show branches from the one virtual repository. Within the namespace, you can still name the branches using whatever method you prefer. Personally, I don’t really see the benefit over just using multiple repositories, but obviously original air max someone thought it might be useful sometimes.

Git has a ton of features, of which maybe 35% see daily usage by the typical developer. The trick to getting along with git, is for those features you don’t want/like/understand, original air max don’t worry about them.

Never done something serious with mercurial, so I can miss something.

I’m using namespaces in git branch naming pretty much, but I’m never inserting my name into the name of the branch.

For each task that are describe in task tracker we are creating a separate branch, with number of the ticket and short description of the bug. At this point there are no spaces yet:remotes/origin/283fullscreenremotes/origin/301usersapiremotes/origin/307dropdowninitonload

Then, say, you realize that some task need additional branches for experimenting. after completion the should (if should at all) be merged to that very task. Here come namespaces: original air max.

Cheap Nike Air Max 90 Floral Print Womens Shoes – Black/Green What is your typical software release deployment regimen

What is your typical software release deployment regimen

Ladies air max 90 original air max this is pretty much common.

Additional information before I go on: The client sends us a list of enhancement requests they want for a particular monthly release and each request is assigned to individual developers. Just putting that out there.

So, ladies air max 90 anyway, the client has recently requested that we do multiple staging deployments per month so they can review the individual enhancements as they are completed. This has thrown a tremendous curve ball at us.

Before, we’d branch our dev branch to the staging branch at the end of the month and then deploy the staging branch to the test site. After they reviewed all enhancements, they’d give the word to deploy to production, after which we’d branch the staging branch to the production branch and then deploy that to the production site.

Now that they want multiple staging deployments per month, however, we have to be very careful in what we deploy to the test site. This is because two developers might be finished with their requests and original air max are ready for deployment, but another dev might still be working on a very large request that might not be done for a few days.

The only option we seem to have is for the dev not to check their unfinished work into source control (SourceGear Vault if anyone needs to know) so that original air max it doesn’t get deployed in a broken state. To make matters worse, we use Oracle packages which don’t exist in source ladies air max 90 control. If one dev has completed their changes to a stored procedure (sproc) in a package, but another dev still has another sproc in the same packaged all borked up because he’s in the middle of making changes, we have to painstakingly move the individual sprocs to the staging environment instead of just doing a build of the entire package.

So what we have had to resort to is basically telling the client that we can’t do staging deployments at whim, that we have original air max to wait until all devs are done with the requests they’re currently working on. The client gets really bickery about this. It’s a real bite.

So what do you guys all do in this situation? Is there a standard construct in place that makes this kind of thing easy that we just don’t know about? Or perhaps this is just the rigid nature of the beast? I’d like to hear the best recommendations of how to go about things such as this original air max.